“There is a giant chasm between the taking and making of an image. This notion is what sets apart the amateur from the professional in my mind.
Anyone in today’s world can take a picture or a video clip. You point the camera, hit a button and see what the processor pulls up for you. The art (for lack of a better word) of taking a photo is being in the right place, at the right time, and getting lucky.
Making an image is an entirely different experience. Making a photo requires skill, knowledge, and the experience of knowing what you want from a set up before you even put the viewfinder up to your eye. The art of making pictures takes a lifetime to master.” (From The Wandering DP Read the whole article here.)
In other words taking an image is shooting a photo , without any preparation, while making a photograph is a process. Making a photograph is a combination of technical skill and knowledge and creativity. Now here is another definition.
PHOTO TAKERS and PHOTO MAKERS (From Faby and Carlo)
Let’s clear the doubts over the quality of the definition “Photo Takers“. I am not looking to diminish the quality of photographers by saying they are photo takers. A Photo Taker is someone who can see the moments arriving, having the ability to capture it. Street photographers and photojournalists are the perfect examples of photo takers; they are able to tell a story without intruding, without posing or directing the subjects.
On the other side, there are the Photo Makers. They direct and poses their subjects in order to make the tight image. They don’t focus on the moment that develops, they build it. Prime examples of photo makers are newborn photographers, who know exactly how to manage a newborn, posing her head to toe.
I don’t fully agree with the above definition. I think there is more to it than that. The street photographer and the photojournalist both still need the technical skills to make the photo. They have to understand exposure, composition, and lighting. They have to go into situation prepared to get the photos. To me this is photo making. Do we make the difference between photo taker and photo maker based on the type of photography? Is the landscape photographer a photo taker or photo maker? What about the food photographer, the portrait photographer, the architectural photographer, the product photographer?
To me the photo taker is someone who is beginning in photography and has a very limited understanding of the technical side of photography. They point and they shoot and stay mainly in Auto Mode. The photo takers are the IPhone users who just snap away to record what is happening to them at the moment. Now could an IPhone user be a photo maker? Of course, if they understand exposure, composition and lighting and if they work at developing their creative skills. Now there does come a time when gear will impose certain limitations on your photography.
To me the photojournalist is not a photo taker. Besides the need for great technical skill, they have to have an understanding of what will tell the story. To me they are photo makers. They are experts at telling stories through their images.
I think it takes time to become a photo maker. How do you get there? Develop a sound knowledge of the basics of photography – exposure, composition and lighting. Study what other photographers are doing. Learn about photographic techniques and styles. And above all, you need to practice and experiment and begin to develop a photographer’s eye and a photographer’s mind. (For more on this you can check out Michael Freeman’s books The Photographer’s Eye and The Photographer’s Mind.